no$sns v1.3 is released. no$sns is a nocash SNES/SFC emulator/debugger for windows
no$sns Features
- The program is 100% assembler code. Accuracy should be quite high (if not: bug are reports welcome).
- Controllers: 1-2 Joypads, Mouse, Lightguns (via mouse), NTT Data Pad, X-Band Keyboard
- Coprocessors: SA-1 (in v1.1), GSU (in v1.1), DSP, ST010/11, CX4, OBC1, S-DD1, SPC7110, S-RTC, RTC-4513
- Add-ons: Satellaview, Turbofile (TFII and STF)
- Debugger: Assembler, Disassembler, Xboo-Upload Function (for testing code on real SNES).
- Requirements: Win95 and up, around 8MB RAM, around 200MHz
- (on 1GHz computers, most games can run 5-10 times faster as on real hardware).
no$sns v1.3 Changelog:
no$sns v1.2 - 28 Apr 2012 - bugfixes, video/controller cleaning-up, sfc-box, etc.
no$sns v1.3 - 14 Aug 2012 - emulates nintendo super systems, pachinko, twin tap, barcode battler
Download: no$sns v1.2
Download: no$sns v1.3 (donate)
Source:Here
Martin Korth, is he back ?
ReplyDeleteno, that's his long lost evil twin
ReplyDeleteNo, it's his non-evil twin; his evil twin decided to rage-quit a while back
DeleteOk tested this is, bullshit free this thing needs a lot of work,is subpar with snes9x, and a lot < than bsnes, is still better than znes tough
ReplyDeleteEverything else is better than Zsnes; that bugger's was released back in 2006, yeah, it has some serious catching up to do.
ReplyDeletesnes 9x 1.53 is the king at the moment, nothing relevant here, only a promise of new emulator
ReplyDeleteSnes9x 1.53 is very accurate, but according to the author of Bsnes, it's only second. But let's be honest, it's impossible for the end-user to tell a difference between the two emulators. I suppose if I looked at the code and how the hardware was reverse-engineered, then yeah. But as far as how games run, how the Ricoh 65816 RISC CUP, Sony SPC700/Nintendo S-SMP, etc synchronize is another matter. Snes9x 1.53 slaughters Zsnes and is on par with Bsnes, but without the high system requirements.
ReplyDeleteUgh. RISC CPU*
ReplyDelete